While I accept your idea of the book falling through wet tissue it's irrelevant because NIST even says that isn't the way the buildings disappeared. They changed their theory as to how the buildings collapsed. You can read that here:
NiST only studied until the building collapse was inevitable.
Their dismissal of the pancake theory is only to point out that the pancaking of floors was the RESULT of the failure, not the cause of the failure.
Did you watch the video of the steel column and girders literally just turning to dust?
It doesn't look like it's turing to dust. It looks like the bottom of the structure weakened and fell. The "dust" is the result of the debris sitting on and around that steal structure.
And are you aware cars were spontaneously combusting on that day. Firefighters oxygen tanks were exploding as well.
There is no evidence of this, except coming from Dr. Judy herself.
Or my point about the water dyke that kept the Hudson river out of the subway/basement lines not being damaged by 1 million tons supposedly crashing to the ground from a quarter mile in the sky.
Most of the support structure of the dyke was destroyed.
However, the debris were enough to keep the walls from falling over.
While removing the debris, several leaks sprong, but since this is expected, most of them didn't make anything more than the local news.
What about that cabinet with it's paper contents still intact inside? Or all the paper contents of the towers just thrown into the streets of New York that day. If this was a normal fire paper wouldn't survive.
There was a huge fire on some of the floors, but many of the floors were not affected by the fire.
This is obvious from the videos.
Or what about the lack of debris at ground zero?
O_o I'm not sure what 9/11 you're talking about, but there was a heck of a lot of debris.
While they're interesting, that's all they are.
In fact, the proof of this video existing only proves that no one is trying to cover it up. Why would the government go after them, but not be able to censor youtube?
And I understand what you meant by saying Star Wars weapons don't exist but they do.
Look. If we have the technology to destroy a huge building like the WTC like magic, and we're not using it in Iraq or Afghanistan after so many years of war.
I'm going to be pissed.
I mean the army has already weponized a heat ray. And do you know who John Hutchison is? Video of what he can do here:
At first, I thought he was using electromagnetic forces to bend things, which is pretty cool, but then I realized they're just moving around. The "bending" is simple perspective, similar to how "psychics" bend spoons.
It's really cool what he's doing, but almost all his words make absolutely no sense at all. He's using interesting science-y words, but fails to use them in any sort of proper context.
Why wouldn't the pentagon just release all of it's security tapes to prove a plane actually hit it? Why would they release one that shoots at 1fps and doesn't even show the side of impact. And why would FBI(or whoever the government officials were) confiscate security tapes from gas stations and stores neighboring the pentagon?
These are the same reason.
They don't have large amounts of taped security cameras in the pentagon. When you deal with top secret information, you don't exactly want that sort of thing. Likewise, when you need a tape of the pentagon, you're going to have to go to places like gas stations and hotels, since they're the only ones that have them.