2017 was our 20th year online!

Welcome to the Piano World Piano Forums
Over 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments.
Over 100,000 members from around the world.
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

Shop our online store for music lovers
SEARCH
Piano Forums & Piano World
(ad)
Best of Piano Buyer
 Best of Piano Buyer
(ad)
Pianoteq
Steinway Spiro Layering
(ad)
Wessell Nickel & Gross
PianoForAll
Who's Online Now
51 members (Burkey, Charles Cohen, c++, chsk, butchkoch, andrea monza, 14 invisible), 966 guests, and 520 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
(ad)
Estonia Pianos
Estonia Pianos
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 513
500 Post Club Member
OP Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 513
So those who read my posts know I care deeply about music and feel quality equipment, hi fi, is an important component for emotional connection to it.

Here is a great story of a guy, nearing his end, and his love for music... and passion to get it to sound its best.

What does this have to do with pianos? Ummm... spend some bucks on speakers and headphones... don't cheap out.

Peace
Bruce in Philly


Last edited by Bruce In Philly; 03/31/21 05:32 PM.

Peace
Bruce in Philly
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
ALS - that's a bummer! Such a cruel disease. What the guy has built is quite astounding.

My Dad would be like this if he could. I helped him last week to get his new speakers up to his hi-fi room. Some sort of Martin Logan electro-statics. He used to have all Krell pre amps, power amps and power supplies. He's changed those in his never-ending quest for PS Audio stuff. I (not very politely) point out that at 78 his hearing's shot but still he carries on. At least with him it is a love of music, not just all about the equipment.

I was into hi-fi for a while as a young man but although it's not my thing these days I will always appreciate high quality sound because it gets you closer to the music.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by Bruce In Philly
So those who read my posts know I care deeply about music and feel quality equipment, hi fi, is an important component for emotional connection to it.

Here is a great story of a guy, nearing his end, and his love for music... and passion to get it to sound its best.

What does this have to do with pianos? Ummm... spend some bucks on speakers and headphones... don't cheap out.

Peace
Bruce in Philly

Ha, Bruce, I remember watching that video a while ago.

My stereo has always brought me a lot of joy so I know where the guy is coming from. I think it’s sad that so many people don’t build a two channel system.

All of us work within the limits of our incomes and time. The nice thing about the building a high quality system is that you can always buy components from people who are further up the feeding chain.

My speakers and my amplifier were bought from very wealthy individuals, one who was turning his three car garage into a listening room, so my speakers were not big enough for that room, and the other from a guy who upgraded to massive mono blocks and no longer needed my small 160w/80kg Class A amplifier, lol.

Here is a picture of my humble rig:

[Linked Image]

Last edited by LarryK; 03/31/21 05:50 PM.
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 805
T
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
T
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 805
I thank my lucky stars every day that I don't suffer from audiophilia. I'm able to enjoy music without my wallet suffering so ... wink

But seriously: thanks for sharing the video.


Decent upright bassist; aspiring decent pianist
Present: Roland DP-603, Roland RD-2000, Yamaha MX61, Casio CDP-130
Past: Roland FP-30, Casio PX-160, Casio PX-830
Etc.: PianoTeq Stage 7 (Bechstein, Bluethner, U4), Roland KC-80
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710

Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 544
E
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 544
I remember my old piano teacher bragging about her new 75k yamaha piano, and it went into a basically cube 9x9x9 room. The room cancellations were awful. This probably describes the fate of the majority of Hifi equipment and pianos.

Does it even make sense to buy pianos above 10K unless you have probably double that to throw into room mods. It's even harder to get the aesthetic in the wife-approved category.

Last edited by EinLudov; 03/31/21 08:11 PM.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Me too!
Originally Posted by TheophilusCarter
I thank my lucky stars every day that I don't suffer from audiophilia. I'm able to enjoy music without my wallet suffering so ... wink
Spending 100x in order to get 10% improvement is just not my game.

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,296
P
4000 Post Club Member
Online Content
4000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,296
I don’t want to be insensitive, but is audiophilia a real thing? If so, what are the existing treatments for audiophiliacs?

Can poor people ‘catch’ this disease or is it a neurological disorder inherited from rich parents?

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 805
T
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
T
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 805
Originally Posted by Pete14
I don’t want to be insensitive, but is audiophilia a real thing? If so, what are the existing treatments for audiophiliacs?
Unfortunately, there is no cure. At best, one can keep it under control by owning better audio equipment than one's friends and family.
Originally Posted by Pete14
Can poor people ‘catch’ this disease or is it a neurological disorder inherited from rich parents?
In my experience, it is typically contracted from college dorm mates, especially those who listen to Pink Floyd.

Last edited by TheophilusCarter; 03/31/21 08:59 PM.

Decent upright bassist; aspiring decent pianist
Present: Roland DP-603, Roland RD-2000, Yamaha MX61, Casio CDP-130
Past: Roland FP-30, Casio PX-160, Casio PX-830
Etc.: PianoTeq Stage 7 (Bechstein, Bluethner, U4), Roland KC-80
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,296
P
4000 Post Club Member
Online Content
4000 Post Club Member
P
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,296
grin

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by Pete14
I don’t want to be insensitive, but is audiophilia a real thing? If so, what are the existing treatments for audiophiliacs?

Can poor people ‘catch’ this disease or is it a neurological disorder inherited from rich parents?

If audiophilia is a malady, it is relatively harmless one, unlike drinking and drug abuse.

Seeing how you can put together a two channel system for a few thousand bucks, as I did in the beginning, I don’t think audiophilia is limited to rich people.

Old amplifiers and speakers can be purchased at bargain prices and the sound quality can be very good.

I purchased and sold gear over a period of decades to arrive at where I am now. I think my amplifier and speakers are a lifetime purchase, well, at least the amplifier.

Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 188
V
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
V
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 188
For me the best of the video is that behind the gigantic speaker abke to reproduce the most infinite frequencies, he has a pair of tall clocks that are the best noise generators ever. Does he stop the clock mechanisms before listening to music?

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by vagfilm
For me the best of the video is that behind the gigantic speaker abke to reproduce the most infinite frequencies, he has a pair of tall clocks that are the best noise generators ever. Does he stop the clock mechanisms before listening to music?


With those speakers, and the amplifiers pushing them, I think the clocks are inaudible, lol. It is easy to stop those clocks, though. I wish they had mentioned SPL achieved by that system. I’d love to hear orchestral music on his system. That’s what big amplifiers are good for, rendering orchestral music.

Dynamic range is something that is challenging for systems, and something that is hard to explain to one’s wife. I have told my wife that in order to hear the quiet parts she’s going to have to tolerate some very loud parts but that the loud parts will not last that long, haha.

It’s funny that heavy metal or rock music with a limited dynamic range can be listened to at any volume level but not orchestral music that has a wide dynamic range.

Last edited by LarryK; 03/31/21 11:01 PM.
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 544
E
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 544
Originally Posted by LarryK
Originally Posted by Pete14
I don’t want to be insensitive, but is audiophilia a real thing? If so, what are the existing treatments for audiophiliacs?

Can poor people ‘catch’ this disease or is it a neurological disorder inherited from rich parents?

If audiophilia is a malady, it is relatively harmless one, unlike drinking and drug abuse.

Vanity is not harmless. Everyone buys one extra speaker, that's a mountain of e-waste. It's a problem when capitalist marketing compels people to buy regardless of whether or not they need the object.

So, we have a problem, a big one, core corruption.

Last edited by EinLudov; 03/31/21 11:51 PM.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Perhaps you should look up the definition of vanity.
This "audiophilia" is not vanity. It could be a compulsive disorder. Or it could be just a hobby. But it's not vanity.

And it's not common. So I'm not concerned about any "mountain of e-waste".

And no one is compelled to buy. Capitalist marketing is not compulsion.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
I thought it would go like this - all the venom against hi-fi lovers who are doing no harm to anyone and just want to hear their music sound better.

I have been an 'audiophile' but no longer consider myself one. I can see both sides but I always find the unpleasantness towards hi-fi lovers from non-hi-fi lovers difficult to rationalise.

At some point surely anyone would accept that some music replay systems are better than others. The desire to improve a music replay system gets labelled as 'audiophilia' or some other derogatory thing. When? Is it based on cost? When is that line crossed (in the minds of the audiophile haters)? I don't know. But how is it intrinsically bad that someone should want to hear their music sound as good as possible within their budget?

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
Everybody wants to hear things better, we're all "audiophiles" in a way. It's when one becomes obsessed with audio quality at the expense of the sheer pleasure from listening to music when it starts being ugly. Purchasing expensive cables and devices that cannot be explained with science, only with pseudo-science and X-Files type of mumbo-jumbo. I have way too many friends who don't use their audiophile systems to listen to music but the other way around: they use some vinyl/CD/tapes as an accessory to listen to their systems and to showcase to other people how much money they spent. That is pervert and deserves any mockery there is.

Last edited by CyberGene; 04/01/21 04:33 AM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by EinLudov
Originally Posted by LarryK
Originally Posted by Pete14
I don’t want to be insensitive, but is audiophilia a real thing? If so, what are the existing treatments for audiophiliacs?

Can poor people ‘catch’ this disease or is it a neurological disorder inherited from rich parents?

If audiophilia is a malady, it is relatively harmless one, unlike drinking and drug abuse.

Vanity is not harmless. Everyone buys one extra speaker, that's a mountain of e-waste. It's a problem when capitalist marketing compels people to buy regardless of whether or not they need the object.

So, we have a problem, a big one, core corruption.

Actually, the problem is one of low quality cheap components that are soon thrown away. What is the lifespan of a Bluetooth speaker or of a cheap component? It is short. The cheap gear from the old days is in the landfills. The high quality gear lasts.

I started out running twenty five year old components from the 1970 and 1980s. Sometimes those components developed issues, but they could be fixed and put back into service. The original designer of the McIntosh MR-78 FM tuner fixed the thing for me for free, decades after it rolled off the production line.

What is this extra speaker you speak of? I always joke that I can barely afford two high quality speakers, I would never buy a third. I find the multichannel speaker systems to be ridiculous, and quality goes down when adding more cheap drivers.

My speaker drivers were handmade, and are of high quality, can handle high power, and will most likely last me for decades more. Even if a cone surround gives out, that can be fixed.

Why is this vanity? Audiophilia has nothing to do with my appearance, it is all about trying to improve sound quality. Since sound quality is difficult to measure, audiophiles get written off as vain creatures, when they’re actually quite harmless, and are only seeking solace in the music.

Beyond the components, the supply side of the music equation has improved dramatically in the last few years. I have access to a vast amount of music, streamed lossless from Tidal and Qobuz under Roon, for $50/month. If I had never bought a physical CD, I would have saved perhaps $50k in my lifetime. That would have paid for a nice system right there.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Everybody wants to hear things better, we're all "audiophiles" in a way. It's when one becomes obsessed with audio quality at the expense of the sheer pleasure from listening to music when it starts being ugly. Purchasing expensive cables and devices that cannot be explained with science, only with pseudo-science and X-Files type of mumbo-jumbo. I have way too many friends who don't use their audiophile systems to listen to music but the other way around: they use some vinyl/CD/tapes as an accessory to listen to their systems and to showcase to other people how much money they spent. That is pervert and deserves any mockery there is.

I remember my classical guitar teacher, whose wife is an opera singer, delighting in what he heard from my system. He heard his favorite recordings with a fidelity that he had never heard before. I just handed him Roon running on my iPad and let him play whatever music he liked. There was such joy in his face. Another friend of mine, also a music teacher, was glued to the couch, conducting the stereo, lol.

I tricked my electrician into thinking I was playing the cello, haha. Imagine, me as Casals!

Vocals can stop me in my tracks. The voice of Nina Simone can make me cry, literally.

For me, the joy and emotion I derive from my stereo system is what matters, the money spent is soon forgotten. You can look up the MSRP but I didn’t pay retail, I bought almost everything used.

Yes, I suppose some people show off how much money they have spent on their stereos. They do the same with cars and houses. How do we differentiate between the love of music and that which you despise?

I could put together a pretty good two channel system for $1k, and I did back in the old days. Sure, after many decades, I have spent more but I only upgrade when I can achieve a dramatic improvement in sound quality. Upgrading my speakers, and then amplifier, have made a huge difference in the sound quality. I am trying to think what would be now yield a large improvement, and, nope, it’s not a cable, lol.

Would it be much better preamp? I don’t know, honestly, and it is hard to tell.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
I’ve noticed there are a very few audiophiles among musicians. Musicians can appreciate your stereo and will love it but in the very next moment they can listen to their favorite recording on the mono speaker of their phone and would not care at all. Audiophiles in my (biased) opinion are most often people who don’t like music. They don’t care and are not touched by music. They collect only music that is considered “referent” for audio quality but would just spin it up for a minute once a month to either enjoy their system, not the music. Or to use it as an excuse for why they need to upgrade the power cable, or whatever, and would always find that there is something that needs an upgrade. There are exceptions of course.

Last edited by CyberGene; 04/01/21 05:32 AM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by EssBrace
I thought it would go like this - all the venom against hi-fi lovers who are doing no harm to anyone and just want to hear their music sound better.

I have been an 'audiophile' but no longer consider myself one. I can see both sides but I always find the unpleasantness towards hi-fi lovers from non-hi-fi lovers difficult to rationalise.

At some point surely anyone would accept that some music replay systems are better than others. The desire to improve a music replay system gets labelled as 'audiophilia' or some other derogatory thing. When? Is it based on cost? When is that line crossed (in the minds of the audiophile haters)? I don't know. But how is it intrinsically bad that someone should want to hear their music sound as good as possible within their budget?

Exactly. I agree completely. The people I have bought my components from have more money than I have to spend on putting together a high quality system but I don’t disparage them because of that. The components they sell me help me improve my sound quality and I help them improve their sound quality by buying components that they are upgrading.

In turn, I sell the components I’m upgrading to those of lesser means so that they can improve their sound quality. I don’t disparage those people either.

I have never heard a complaint from anybody I have sold a piece of gear to, they’ve all been happy with the price and quality of what they’ve received.

Last edited by LarryK; 04/01/21 05:32 AM.
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Audiophiles in my (biased) opinion are most often people who don’t like music. They don’t care and are not touched by music.

Given that the point of a hi-fi system is to play music your statement is rather odd.

Why is wanting a better turntable/streamer/CD player/amps/speakers any different to wanting a better piano? Or better car? Or better wristwatch?

Using your argument:

Buyers of expensive or luxury cars don't like driving. Buyers of a high quality watch don't care about time. Buyers of Steinways or Avant Grands don't care about the piano.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by EssBrace
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Audiophiles in my (biased) opinion are most often people who don’t like music. They don’t care and are not touched by music.

Given that the point of a hi-fi system is to play music your statement is rather odd.

Why is wanting a better turntable/streamer/CD player/amps/speakers any different to wanting a better piano? Or better car? Or better wristwatch?

Using your argument:

Buyers of expensive or luxury cars don't like driving. Buyers of a high quality watch don't care about time. Buyers of Steinways or Avant Grands don't care about the piano.

Haha, brilliant point. When dealing with goods that can rise in value, there can be an argument made that the owners do not care about using the item. For instance, someone once quipped that Leica should stop putting shutters in their cameras because people were collecting them and not using them, in the hope that the value of them would rise.

This is not the case with any of the items you’ve mentioned, they’re all depreciating assets and are put into service. I don’t sit around with my stereo components in the original boxes hoping they’ll increase in value, I use them every day.

Does somebody who tolerates music on a terrible sound system love music more than someone who appreciates music on a finer playback system? I worked for a very wealthy man who played music in the office on a tiny Bluetooth speaker. The sound was terrible, but I did not complain, although I wished he would just use headphones like I did.

Last edited by LarryK; 04/01/21 06:09 AM.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
Originally Posted by EssBrace
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Audiophiles in my (biased) opinion are most often people who don’t like music. They don’t care and are not touched by music.

Given that the point of a hi-fi system is to play music your statement is rather odd.

Why is wanting a better turntable/streamer/CD player/amps/speakers any different to wanting a better piano? Or better car? Or better wristwatch?

Using your argument:

Buyers of expensive or luxury cars don't like driving. Buyers of a high quality watch don't care about time. Buyers of Steinways or Avant Grands don't care about the piano.
Exactly! People who buy luxury cars would most often buy them because they want to show off or because they enjoy how technologically advanced the car is. Same for Steinways and AvantGrands. Please note that I used "most often" and "there are exceptions of course".


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Originally Posted by EssBrace
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Audiophiles in my (biased) opinion are most often people who don’t like music. They don’t care and are not touched by music.

Given that the point of a hi-fi system is to play music your statement is rather odd.

Why is wanting a better turntable/streamer/CD player/amps/speakers any different to wanting a better piano? Or better car? Or better wristwatch?

Using your argument:

Buyers of expensive or luxury cars don't like driving. Buyers of a high quality watch don't care about time. Buyers of Steinways or Avant Grands don't care about the piano.
Exactly! People who buy luxury cars would most often buy them because they want to show off or because they enjoy how technologically advanced the car is. Same for Steinways and AvantGrands. Please note that I used "most often" and "there are exceptions of course".

What is wrong with enjoying technological advancements? I haven’t owned a car for the last twenty years. It was not until we started building cars that included autonomous driving features that my interest was piqued and I bought a Tesla Model 3. The car will outlast me, is zero emission, always has a full tank of “gas”, and has incredible acceleration. I’m happy. I needed a car and did not want a gas car and so I bit the bullet.

I voted with my dollars to not burn more gasoline, and my small purchase helps pave the way for even cheaper electric vehicles.

MIT did a study and found that electric car owners win over the long term. We pay more upfront, but gain from reduced maintenance costs, lower “fuel” costs, etc, over the long haul. I’m in it for the long haul.

How do you define showing off? Why can’t we celebrate human advancement in all its forms? People work hard to build better sound systems, cars, and pianos. Their efforts should be applauded, not denigrated.

Last edited by LarryK; 04/01/21 06:24 AM.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
Electric cars are an entirely different discussion. I have no opinion. Or I have but it's because there are almost no charging stations over here, so if I have to travel to the seaside with an electric car, or do a road trip the way we love to do with my wife, they will have to tow me at some moment.

Originally Posted by LarryK
How do you define showing off? Why can’t we celebrate human advancement in all its forms? People work hard to build better sound systems, cars, and pianos. Their efforts should be applauded, not denigrated.

As to showing off. There is showing off and showing off. Human advancement isn't measured in what you can purchase with your money. Or are you telling me that it's easy to spot which Lamborghini driver is a neurosurgeon and which is a money launderer? People should show off with their actual achievement, not with assets derived from the money they earned through their skills.

Am I showing off with my piano clips in the N1X thread? Well, to a certain degree yes, although there are zillions of people that play better than me, so it's also pretty silly and boring. But at least I'm trying to show how I play and how I learned a new piece and how the AvantGrand helped me play better (I've posted comparisons in the past about how I can play better trills on a real piano actions, etc.), and not how I own an AvantGrand, otherwise I would post pictures of my living room with the N1X smile

Audiophile stories are just showing off because we can't hear how it sounds. So it's just silly showing off.

Last edited by CyberGene; 04/01/21 06:51 AM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
I think this argument is beginning to ignore the difference between spending large sums and being obsessive over the ownership of such items.

If I read this correctly, CG finds distaste in the latter. His view of audiophilia involves obsession or compulsion or vanity, or some combination of these.

It seems that Larry and Ess fall into the former category: spenders who lack the peculiar obsession. Do they see themselves as "audiophiles"? I think CG does not.

But the term (like many others) is vague. I think this argument derives from that vagueness.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Electric cars are an entirely different discussion. I have no opinion. Or I have but it's because there are almost no charging stations over here, so if I have to travel to the seaside with an electric car, or do a road trip the way we love to do with my wife, they will have to tow me at some moment.

The future is coming, and charging stations along with it. With ranges of over 300 miles, now, the electric car is a viable option. I use 120v to charge at night and my car is ready for me every morning but I don’t drive long distances.

Originally Posted by LarryK
How do you define showing off? Why can’t we celebrate human advancement in all its forms? People work hard to build better sound systems, cars, and pianos. Their efforts should be applauded, not denigrated.

Originally Posted by CyberGene
As to showing off. There is showing off and showing off. Human advancement isn't measured in what you can purchase with your money. Or are you telling me that it's easy to spot which Lamborghini driver is a neurosurgeon and which is a money launderer? People should show off with their actual achievement, not with assets derived from the money they earned through their skills.

Am I showing off with my piano clips in the N1X thread? Well, to a certain degree yes, although there are zillions of people that play better than me, so it's also pretty silly and boring. But at least I'm trying to show how I play and how I learned a new piece and how the AvantGrand helped me play better (I've posted comparisons in the past about how I can play better trills on a real piano actions, etc.), and not how I own an AvantGrand, otherwise I would post pictures of my living room with the N1X smile

Audiophile stories are just showing off because we can't hear how it sounds. So it's just silly showing off.

People enable human advancement through what they purchase. If we all spent our money on criminal enterprises, there would be more crime in the world.

Since most of us do not do that, we have things like sophisticated pianos, autonomous vehicles, amazing computer systems, and good stereo systems.

I do find super cars to be a bit silly, as I am long past the age where I could drive one anywhere close to its limits and I’m not a race car driver. The Tesla is faster than any car I wanted in high school, lol.

As for the piano, and your use of the AvantGrand enabling your progress, good for you. I’m going to try to get a teacher to use my Disklavier as a tool in teaching me how to play the piano.

Everybody hears a poor reproduction of the actual sound of an instrument or stereo when captured in a recording. Unless you’re in the room, you’re not hearing the thing. Still, there is some essence of the thing in a recording.

I was on a Zoom work call and had absentmindedly left the stereo playing downstairs. The people on the Zoom call said, where is that beautiful music coming from? Ha, I could not believe that it sounded good at all, considering it is on the other end of a Zoom call.

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 614
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 614
This is how I describe myself:

- I appreciate how higher end headphones sound. I can see the difference between them and cheaper ones.
- I don't understand the physics of sound and digital technology well enough answer the question: is what I have now the best and end of it, or is there something more?
- Because I don't understand, I get another pair.
- Then frustrated because I cannot answer that question never seems to go away, I return to the original one I bought a few years ago, which was itself an expensive purchase

I love the sound the audiophile headphones provide. I can hear the difference between them, radio and other headphones.

But what category am I? Obsessive? Ignorant? Spoiled brat? All three? I actually now realize I am not an audiophile. True audiophiles seem to have an understand of how sound and sound-related technology works.


A man must love a thing very much if he practices it without any hope of fame or money, but even practice it without any hope of doing it well. Such a man must love the toils of the work more than any other man can love the rewards of it.
G. K. Chesterton
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
L
2000 Post Club Member
Online Content
2000 Post Club Member
L
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by mmathew
This is how I describe myself:

- I appreciate how higher end headphones sound. I can see the difference between them and cheaper ones.
- I don't understand the physics of sound and digital technology well enough answer the question: is what I have now the best and end of it, or is there something more?
- Because I don't understand, I get another pair.
- Then frustrated because I cannot answer that question never seems to go away, I return to the original one I bought a few years ago, which was itself an expensive purchase

I love the sound the audiophile headphones provide. I can hear the difference between them, radio and other headphones.

But what category am I? Obsessive? Ignorant? Spoiled brat? All three? I actually now realize I am not an audiophile. True audiophiles seem to have an understand of how sound and sound-related technology works.

I don’t think one can win in the court of public opinion. Ad hominem attacks are to be expected. If you buy something that was expensive, they’ll say you could have gotten better quality at 10% of the price, and that you hate music. If you buy cheap stuff they’ll say you’re a true music lover who transcends the limits of the equipment.

It is natural to be confused by the myriad choices out there and the difficulty of finding what sounds better but some systems do sound better than other systems, and some components are built to higher levels of quality then other components. The same applies to headphones, of course.

I don’t think you need to know anything about sound to appreciate good sound. If it sounds good it is good.

I’m not much into headphones anymore because I no longer ride the subway. Besides, I don’t like being locked into one physical position. Also, I now work at home so I can play my system out loud.

Last edited by LarryK; 04/01/21 08:50 AM.
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 298
R
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
R
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 298
I've only heard outstanding hi-fi systems a few times and was blown away each time, what a pleasurable experience!!!!!!!!!!! I would love to have a 'higher-end' system, but honestly I don't sit and listen to music much. I would invest in higher end monitors for my keyboard, which could do second duty as mix-down reference.

Probably the best sound I've ever heard was at an outdoor wedding. I'd set up 2 sets of speakers for the ceremony and reception, which was in an open meadow with a hill that rose up on one side somewhat steeply. I was aghast, what a sound! It felt completely 3d, I felt like I was INSIDE the sound, totally mesmerizing.

My speakers were nothing special, so I attributed it to the sound not bouncing off walls, and the hill that was next to us, bouncing the sound back.


The best speakers/headphones I've ever used were my Sennheiser HD 540 Reference II headphones, probably 25 years old? Beautiful, crisp, enveloping sound.


Randy
Kawai ES110/ES920, Casio CT-X5000
Flute / Alto recorder / Melodica / iPad music apps
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 154
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 154
Originally Posted by CyberGene
I’ve noticed there are a very few audiophiles among musicians. Musicians can appreciate your stereo and will love it but in the very next moment they can listen to their favorite recording on the mono speaker of their phone and would not care at all. Audiophiles in my (biased) opinion are most often people who don’t like music. They don’t care and are not touched by music. They collect only music that is considered “referent” for audio quality but would just spin it up for a minute once a month to either enjoy their system, not the music. Or to use it as an excuse for why they need to upgrade the power cable, or whatever, and would always find that there is something that needs an upgrade. There are exceptions of course.

I think, most arrangers, film scorers, composers (chamber orchestra) would disagree. These are people who love music, they create it, touch people with it. But as with every occupation, they need the best tools. They need to hear every detail. Primarily they are musicians, but are audiophiles as well by the definition of the hifi gears they use/need.

I understand audiophiles who always find something missing here, there. F1 drivers are the same, they can't win races while fidgeting about something, like too far pedals, or too soft a seat, or a tiny smudge in the helmet visor. Surgeons have their own quirks as well. There are just that, people who prefer to enjoy stuff or do stuff on their own terms.

To summarize, some people take a dump to loud music, others to scented candles and zen music. Whatever it takes to get the job done. smile


Hard at work while waiting for my dream DP....
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
Originally Posted by josh_sounds
I think, most arrangers, film scorers, composers (chamber orchestra) would disagree. These are people who love music, they create it, touch people with it. But as with every occupation, they need the best tools. They need to hear every detail. Primarily they are musicians, but are audiophiles as well by the definition of the hifi gears they use/need.

These people use studio equipment: monitors, mixing desks, audio interfaces, computers, plugins, software.

They don’t buy pseudo-science such as expensive USB and power cables or audiophile speakers and components.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
Originally Posted by CyberGene
They don’t buy pseudo-science such as expensive USB and power cables or audiophile speakers and components.

So what is an audiophile speaker, or component?

The haters always give me the impression that they don't even accept some pieces of equipment are in fact better than others. Some ARE better and they SOUND better. And consequently they invariably cost more. I know you are way too sensible to take the view that all speakers (as one example) sound the same. So what is the problem with someone wanting the best they can afford? When does that cross the line into being an audiophile?

Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 154
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 154
Well, I wouldn't call the man in OP's video an audiophile by Cybergene's standards.
Even if he has a super steady table for vinyl record player with 3 almost-floor-to-ceiling speakers. Respect is still a must.
Although we find it funny to see an expensive sports car stuck in traffic like the rest of us,
we don't walk up to the guy and dance around his car, do we? We don't judge another man's culture by our own. Like when taking a dump, most Western cultures does it sitting down, while most Asian culture prefer squatting, neither is wrong.


Hard at work while waiting for my dream DP....
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
Originally Posted by EssBrace
Originally Posted by CyberGene
They don’t buy pseudo-science such as expensive USB and power cables or audiophile speakers and components.

So what is an audiophile speaker, or component?

Sorry, I was a bit over the top. I actually think speakers and components make difference. And I think some of my friends’ outrageously expensive speakers are worth it (of course with the law of diminishing returns fully applicable but that applies to pianos too).

What I wanted to say is composers and arrangers IMO rarely use audiophile speakers because they prefer studio monitors. Not because audiophile speakers are bad. They are not! I guess we all mean slightly different things when calling someone an audiophile. I appreciate good audio quality, so to a certain degree I’m an audiophile too maybe.

Speaking of which, I think I may be overly sensitive in regards to audiophile talk because I participate in a closed audiophile forum (it’s a long story but I was invited by my best man because I wanted to find good headphones). Some of these guys have USB cables that cost €1000 and they believe they can hear how that makes the sound “more open, punchy, velvety” and nonsense like that. It’s a digital cable carrying zeroes and ones, not audio, how come one can believe a cable carrying digital signals can make the sound more “open” and is worth it €1000 is beyond me. If that’s not the best example for stupidity, I don’t know what is…

Which is why I may be too grumpy when I hear “audiophilia”.


My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
E
4000 Post Club Member
Offline
4000 Post Club Member
E
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,310
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Originally Posted by EssBrace
Originally Posted by CyberGene
They don’t buy pseudo-science such as expensive USB and power cables or audiophile speakers and components.

So what is an audiophile speaker, or component?

Sorry, I was a bit over the top. I actually think speakers and components make difference. And I think some of my friends’ outrageously expensive speakers are worth it (of course with the law of diminishing returns fully applicable but that applies to pianos too).

...I think I may be overly sensitive in regards to audiophile talk because I participate in a closed audiophile forum (it’s a long story but I was invited by my best man because I wanted to find good headphones). Some of these guys have USB cables that cost €1000 and they believe they can hear how that makes the sound “more open, punchy, velvety” and nonsense like that. It’s a digital cable carrying zeroes and ones, not audio, how come one can believe a cable carrying digital signals can make the sound more “open” and is worth it €1000 is beyond me. If that’s not the best example for stupidity, I don’t know what is…

Diminishing returns, yes, definitely. At the high end you can spend multiples more to get another few percentage points of whatever it is you're looking for.

As far as cables (especially cables for digital data) are concerned I pretty much agree with you. But I don't think it's stupidity on the part of people who do spend big on such things. They hear a difference. Or they think they do. And that's all that matters. My Dad is into it. I always say to him he wouldn't tell any difference in a controlled blind test. But ultimately he thinks he hears a difference. Which makes him happy. I don't think we should underestimate the effects of psycho-acoustic phenomena. Thinking you hear something can be as good as hearing something in certain circumstances. Like a placebo effect in clinical trials. This is really powerful stuff; the power of the mind over physical aspects.

All audiophiles (or, we could just call them people) are trying to do is get closer to the music; to hear it better. To hear it sound as good as it can within the limitations of the original recording. Because that's what gives them pleasure. Given what some people spend their money on, or what their interests are that might be destructive and/or negative (hunting or killing living things for pleasure for example), I just can't understand the irrational unpleasantness that is directed at them from some quarters.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
How? you ask ...
Originally Posted by CyberGene
Some of these guys have USB cables that cost €1000 and they believe they can hear how that makes the sound “more open, punchy, velvety” and nonsense like that ...
It’s a digital cable carrying zeroes and ones, not audio ...
How come one can believe a cable carrying digital signals can make the sound more “open” and is worth it €1000 is beyond me.
Why did the Heaven's Gate people believe that they would ascend into the afterlife by committing suicide when the Hale–Bopp comet approached?

Beliefs come in many shapes. But I don't know how.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,534
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,534
I grew up in the 1950s \ 1960s and fondly remember reading equipment reviews by Julian Hirsch and Gladden Houck in Stereo Review.

They measured and tested equipment and removed the b̶u̶l̶l̶s̶h̶i̶t̶ metaphysical nonsense. smile


Yamaha AvantGrand N3 | Roland RD 2000 | Sennheiser HD 598 headphones
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 614
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 614
Better materials do make a difference in the audio output. Better materials literally every inch of the audio chain do make the audio better. Consequently, the price goes up, and I can accept that.

Forget $1000 USB cables for a minute. There is a post somewhere in the mazes of the audiophiles forums that talks about a specific type of weight block (I forget the technical term), that is placed on top of a high-end CD player. The weight block reduces the vibrations introduced by normal operation of the CD player, to negligible levels or zero. And the science says that the audio is cleaner by that much. I remember the price of that block to be well over $1K US.

I love the passion and science that's in play in audiophilia.


A man must love a thing very much if he practices it without any hope of fame or money, but even practice it without any hope of doing it well. Such a man must love the toils of the work more than any other man can love the rewards of it.
G. K. Chesterton
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,534
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,534
Originally Posted by mmathew
Better materials do make a difference in the audio output. Better materials literally every inch of the audio chain do make the audio better. Consequently, the price goes up, and I can accept that.

Forget $1000 USB cables for a minute. There is a post somewhere in the mazes of the audiophiles forums that talks about a specific type of weight block (I forget the technical term), that is placed on top of a high-end CD player. The weight block reduces the vibrations introduced by normal operation of the CD player, to negligible levels or zero. And the science says that the audio is cleaner by that much. I remember the price of that block to be well over $1K US.

I love the passion and science that's in play in audiophilia.

You realize that CDs deal with digital information and use error correction, correct? I sincerely hope you're being somewhat facetious in your writing.


Yamaha AvantGrand N3 | Roland RD 2000 | Sennheiser HD 598 headphones
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 614
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by Dave Horne
Originally Posted by mmathew
Better materials do make a difference in the audio output. Better materials literally every inch of the audio chain do make the audio better. Consequently, the price goes up, and I can accept that.

Forget $1000 USB cables for a minute. There is a post somewhere in the mazes of the audiophiles forums that talks about a specific type of weight block (I forget the technical term), that is placed on top of a high-end CD player. The weight block reduces the vibrations introduced by normal operation of the CD player, to negligible levels or zero. And the science says that the audio is cleaner by that much. I remember the price of that block to be well over $1K US.

I love the passion and science that's in play in audiophilia.

You realize that CDs deal with digital information and use error correction, correct? I sincerely hope you're being somewhat facetious in your writing.

I am not an audiophile - far from it. I was simply summarizing what I read on that audiophile room. A high end CD player (marantz or technics - I don't remember) - with a solid block on top to remove vibrations. They said that CD produces 1.4 mbps quality and the connected headphones translate that quality truly.

As you can infer from my noob description of what is a very technical matter - I don't know much about audiophilia. I do own a lot of classical music CDs, and simply play them on my Sony blu-ray player and listen to them on beyerdynamic headphones - that's all I need.


A man must love a thing very much if he practices it without any hope of fame or money, but even practice it without any hope of doing it well. Such a man must love the toils of the work more than any other man can love the rewards of it.
G. K. Chesterton
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Offline
Yikes! 10000 Post Club Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,780
I hope they chose the right material for that block.

The more porous the stone the better it is at eliminating unharmonious delta-wave modulation.
If it lacks the proper porosity that could induce excessive sub-space interference.

So ... always be cautious before buying such things!

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 805
T
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
T
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 805
This all sounds rather wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey. And what if we reversed the polarity of the neutron flow? ...

wink


Decent upright bassist; aspiring decent pianist
Present: Roland DP-603, Roland RD-2000, Yamaha MX61, Casio CDP-130
Past: Roland FP-30, Casio PX-160, Casio PX-830
Etc.: PianoTeq Stage 7 (Bechstein, Bluethner, U4), Roland KC-80
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
6000 Post Club Member
Offline
6000 Post Club Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,986
Originally Posted by EssBrace
As far as cables (especially cables for digital data) are concerned I pretty much agree with you. But I don't think it's stupidity on the part of people who do spend big on such things. They hear a difference. Or they think they do. And that's all that matters. My Dad is into it. I always say to him he wouldn't tell any difference in a controlled blind test. But ultimately he thinks he hears a difference. Which makes him happy. I don't think we should underestimate the effects of psycho-acoustic phenomena. Thinking you hear something can be as good as hearing something in certain circumstances. Like a placebo effect in clinical trials. This is really powerful stuff; the power of the mind over physical aspects.
Funny, because I see it exactly the same way. Well, it took me some time but I came to the same realization and is why I stopped being annoyed too much with those guys. I accept that even though they may be hearing things only in their imagination, it's a valid thing, it's a psychoacoustic phenomenon and so be it. I guess I still have my own rational resistance coming up from time to time but out of respect of those guys, I vent it here and not in the audiophile forum. Which is silly, because it's disrespectful towards the audiophiles here... For which I apologize. After all, in this forum we're not much different and I've been guilty myself, obsessed with escapement, real actions, half-pedaling timings and whatnot. There's a saying here: every lunatic has his own act 😀

Originally Posted by EssBrace
All audiophiles (or, we could just call them people) are trying to do is get closer to the music; to hear it better. To hear it sound as good as it can within the limitations of the original recording. Because that's what gives them pleasure. Given what some people spend their money on, or what their interests are that might be destructive and/or negative (hunting or killing living things for pleasure for example), I just can't understand the irrational unpleasantness that is directed at them from some quarters.
Agree. Good counter-example BTW, since I really despise hunting and hunters and with that in mind I realize I'm sometimes way too harsh towards audiophiles when only thing they do is spend their money in a harmless way for something they love. If I had to choose, I would replace all hunters in the world with audiophiles without a blink!

Last edited by CyberGene; 05/06/21 02:30 AM.

My YouTube, My Soundcloud
Currently: Yamaha N1X, DIY hybrid controller -> Garritan CFX
Previously: NU1X, ES7, MP6, CA63, RD-700SX, CDP-100, FP-5, P90, SP-200
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 711
D
500 Post Club Member
Offline
500 Post Club Member
D
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 711
I have a friend who is just like that sometimes -- he has had some really serious health problems and recently had a stroke... But he still... keeps... listening!!! I admire his love for good music. But what he loved the most was sitting down and hear me play a piece or two. Sadly he is in my home country of China while I'm currently studying abroad in the US. I miss him... He taught me what good and enjoyable sound should sound like, and though I don't have a system as detailed as his, I enjoy it when I play my piano VSTs, or when I put on a CD rip to listen to. I've learned to both make music, and to enjoy it, thanks to this audiophile friend. Now I consider myself an audiophile too.
Note: I just have a pair of powered speakers hooked up to an audio interface.
Thanks for sharing this story!!!

Last edited by David Lai; 05/06/21 05:57 PM.
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 347
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 347
I would say true audiophiles -as far as pianists are concerned- lived centuries ago, with their ultimate fidelity acoustic instruments. What we call audiophile (digital) pianists today, are actually trying to minimize the loss in trading sound quality for comfort.

Last edited by meghdad; 05/07/21 06:00 AM.

Pianoteq + Korg C1.

I shall be "thankful" for this decent alternative to an upright piano. Hallelujah.
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 353
P
Full Member
Offline
Full Member
P
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 353
Originally Posted by EssBrace
psycho-acoustic phenomena

Hope you don't mind correcting terminology here. "Psychoacoustics" has nothing to do with imaginary sounds per se, but it refers to the field of scientific study of the perception of acoustic phenomena (sound). Basically it is the study of hearing, especially of 'lower level' acoustic features, things like frequency, amplitude, location.

Hearing something that has no acoustic basis because you paid $1000 for a cable would be a valid topic to study, but psychoacoustics is not limited to that.

Hearing something that has no acoustic basis happens all the time, usually because the brain incorporates information from other senses and memory. A famous example is the McGurk effect (there are nice Youtube videos on this). It is difficult (impossible?) just to perceive sound in isolation. The brain always incorporates the context from other senses and prior knowledge.

Last edited by pianogabe; 05/07/21 07:13 AM. Reason: typo
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Piano World 

Link Copied to Clipboard
(ad)
Faust Harrison Pianos
Faust Harrison 100+ Steinway pianos
(ad)
PianoDisc

PianoDisc
(ad)
Piano Life Saver - Dampp Chaser
Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver
(ad)
Mason & Hamlin Pianos
New Topics - Multiple Forums
Best Tuner for singing?
by ZanderChicago - 06/20/21 11:37 AM
Recent 24” M1 iMac and Pianos
by dhts - 06/20/21 07:55 AM
Digital piano - online vs in store purchase.
by witor - 06/20/21 07:45 AM
help finding best action DP
by luisdent - 06/20/21 02:03 AM
I’m completely lost!
by Mils - 06/19/21 11:33 PM
Download Sheet Music
Virtual Sheet Music - Classical Sheet Music Downloads
Forum Statistics
Forums42
Topics207,616
Posts3,105,615
Members101,868
Most Online15,252
Mar 21st, 2010
Please Support Our Advertisers

Faust Harrison 100+ Steinways

Dampp Chaser Piano Life Saver

 Best of Piano Buyer

PianoTeq Bechstein
Visit our online store for gifts for music lovers

Virtual Sheet Music - Classical Sheet Music Downloads



 
Help keep the forums up and running with a donation, any amount is appreciated!
Or by becoming a Subscribing member! Thank-you.
Donate   Subscribe
 
Our Piano Related Classified Ads
| Dealers | Tuners | Lessons | Movers | Restorations | Pianos For Sale | Sell Your Piano |

Advertise on Piano World
| Subscribe | Piano World | PianoSupplies.com | Advertise on Piano World |
| |Contact | Privacy | Legal | About Us | Site Map | Free Newsletter | MapleStreetMusicShop.com - Our store in Cornish Maine


© copyright 1997 - 2021 Piano World ® all rights reserved
No part of this site may be reproduced without prior written permission
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5